CWP-32748- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 216 SHARANJEET KAUR UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP Present: Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of orders dated respondent No.4 dismissing the husband of the petitioner from service and order dated 11.06.2019 (P No.2 thereby rejecting the statutory appeal of the petitioner against the above-said orders determine and pay all the monetary benefits payable to the petitioner on account of death of her husband and to grant family pension to the petitioner from the date of death of -2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 SHARANJEET KAUR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) * * * * This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of orders dated 07.03.2013 (P-2) and 27.05.2013 (P respondent No.4 dismissing the husband of the petitioner from e and order dated 11.06.2019 (P No.2 thereby rejecting the statutory appeal of the petitioner against said orders, with further directions to the respondents to determine and pay all the monetary benefits payable to the etitioner on account of death of her husband and to grant family pension to the petitioner from the date of death of - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32748-2019 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari for quashing the 2) and 27.05.2013 (P-5) passed by respondent No.4 dismissing the husband of the petitioner from e and order dated 11.06.2019 (P-10) passed by respondent No.2 thereby rejecting the statutory appeal of the petitioner against , with further directions to the respondents to determine and pay all the monetary benefits payable to the etitioner on account of death of her husband and to grant family pension to the petitioner from the date of death of her husband i.e. Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the certiorari for quashing the 5) passed by respondent No.4 dismissing the husband of the petitioner from y respondent No.2 thereby rejecting the statutory appeal of the petitioner against , with further directions to the respondents to determine and pay all the monetary benefits payable to the etitioner on account of death of her husband and to grant family her husband i.e. NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.11 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-32748- on 14.03.2013 and to pay all the arrear alongwith interest @ 12% per annum. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits claim of the petitioner is under process and the same will be released within a period of 06 weeks from today itself. 3. In the light of the above, petitioner does not want to press the present petition. 4. Dismissed as 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the petition in case the respondents do not adhere to the aforesaid undertaking made before the Court. 10.09.2025 NainaRajput Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No -2019 on 14.03.2013 and to pay all the arrear alongwith interest @ 12% Learned counsel for the respondents submits claim of the petitioner is under process and the same will be released within a period of 06 weeks from today itself. In the light of the above, petitioner does not want to press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed at t However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the petition in case the respondents do not adhere to the aforesaid undertaking made before the Court. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 10.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No - 2- on 14.03.2013 and to pay all the arrear alongwith interest @ 12% Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claim of the petitioner is under process and the same will be released within a period of 06 weeks from today itself. In the light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition. this stage. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the petition in case the respondents do not adhere to the aforesaid (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No on 14.03.2013 and to pay all the arrear alongwith interest @ 12% that the claim of the petitioner is under process and the same will be for the However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the petition in case the respondents do not adhere to the aforesaid NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.11 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document