Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9525 (PNJ)

JARNAIL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/1280/2025 · 2025-01-18

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-1280-2025 ! !" # $% & !'!( ) !*+, % - %*++.!" # +$ / *+, % 0 1 2 ! !#( % / %% 34+( 5561*// 7 1558 !% % */ %% ) 7 , %( 9 % ( $! , %( 9 * !" #, %% ( 158*+:!&* !# (*( 6*+:!&1#9 ; - (( 9* . ,( !" #* $! , %( 9 % (!% 9* % 7 *%!! % #9- ! 6555<! ! (% #, % ( (# ! ( 1 The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of MOHIT 2025.01.18 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1280-2025 hearing, learned State counsel sought instructions and thus states that in case, a detailed representation further subtantiating the claim is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided within a further period of 6 months, which satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reason, whereupon the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon !" "# ' ( =% 7> ?>0 =% # ?>0 MOHIT 2025.01.18 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document