Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9524 (UTT)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND v. NARESH KUMAR SISHODHIYA

SPLA/177/2023 · 2025-03-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SPLA No. 177 of 2023 with GA No. 72 of 2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/appellant 2. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. 3. State has sought leave to appeal challenging the judgment dated 29.09.2022. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, particularly, deposition of the victim, as made before the Trial Court, we are of the opinion that this is a fit case in which leave has to be granted. 5. Accordingly, Leave to Appeal Application is allowed. 6. Admit the Appeal. 7. Trial Court Record be summoned. 8. List on 09.06.2025. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.03.2025 Navin