[2025:RJ-JP:22765] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3282/2025 Ravi Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Birdi Chand Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Rajpura Patwalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Jaipur Through Its Registrar 2. Controller Of Examinations, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Jaipur 3. Vice Chancellor, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Jaipur 4. Rajdhani Law College, Bani Park, Jaipur Through Principal. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kumar for Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Maloo JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/05/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the following prayer has been made:- “(I) issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to double revaluation of answer books of 2 paper i.e. 1231- Constitution of law & 1237- Legal Language Legal writing and General English by checking each question and declared the revised result of petitioner. (II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may further be directed to award 9 grace marks to the petitioner in LL.B. Ist years [2025:RJ-JP:22765] (2 of 3) [CW-3282/2025] as per point No. II. (4) of guidelines of respondent University. (III) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may also be directed to declare the revised result after the revaluation of 2 papers of LL.B. Ist year and if any paper remain due then allow the petitioner to appear in the exam of due paper with the supplementary exam of LL.B. third year 2023-2024. (IV) Further, the petitioner may be allowed to participate in the 4 exams of the first year i.e. Family law - I (Hindu law), family law- II (Mohammedan law), legal & constitutional history of India, and law of contract general principles & Specific Relief Act and the respondents may be directed to award the degree of Bachelor of Laws if he secures the required aggregate i.e 48%. (V) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the Petitioner. 2. The multiple prayers have been made for issuing directions to the respondents to re-valuate the answer sheet of the petitioner of question paper i.e., Constitution of Law and Legal Language. A direction has also been sought against the respondents to award him 9 grace marks in LLB 1st year and his result be revised after re-valuation of two papers of LLB 1st year, thereafter allow him to appear in four exams of 1st year, i.e., Family Law – I (Hindu Law), Family Law – II, Legal and Constitutional History of India and Specific Relief Act and the respondents be further directed to award the degree to the petitioner of Bachelor of Laws, if he secures the required aggregate marks i.e., 48%. [2025:RJ-JP:22765] (3 of 3) [CW-3282/2025] 3. This fact is not in dispute that the petitioner has failed to secure the minimum marks as prescribed under the Ordinance in 1st year and Final year even after re-valuation of his marks. 4. No direction can be issued contrary to the Ordinance, if the petitioner has failed to pass the requisite examination with the minimum aggregate marks, i.e., 48%. No individual direction can be passed in favour of the petitioner to appear in a particular examination. 5. This writ petition is found to be highly misconceived. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby rejected. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand rejected. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/395