Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9524 (AP)

Mannuru Malyadri, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4733/2019 · 2025-08-06

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010105692019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4733/2019 Between: 1. MANNURU MALYADRI,, S/O. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. G4, A-BLOCK, PAVANI TOWERS, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. MANNURU VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. MALYADRI, AGED ABOIUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. G4, A-BLOCK, PAVANI TOWERS, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODALAKURU POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEJARLA POLICE STATION, CHEJARLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 5. N SURESH NAIDU, S/O.DEVARAJULU, R/O.TURPUGAGAVARAM VILLAGE, THALLURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and pressurizing the petitioners to pay the amounts and pressurizing to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and not to pressurize the petitioners to pay the amounts and not to pressurize to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioners repeatedly to the Police Station and not to pressurize the petitioners to pay the amounts and not to pressurize to sign on empty promissory notes and empty cheques in favour of the 5th respondents and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4733 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri C.Subodh, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 07.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4733 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2025 PSA