HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7596 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Chandan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Rohit Nandan Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the material placed on record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been moved on behalf of applicant-Rani Devi @ Ranno, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 314 of 2024, under Sections 352, 351(2), 108 of B.N.S., Police Station Chaubepur, District Kanpur Nagar, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is named in the F.I.R. along with three other accused. The allegation made in the F.I.R. is that on the date of occurrence when the daughter of informant was sleeping in night in the verandah, then one named accused-Sahil came there and flirted her, when this incident came into knowledge of the informant he complained to the father of Sahil namely Ramlakhan, then his mother (applicant), his father and son-in-law of Ramlakhan while hurling abuses to the informant and his daughter threatened, on which daughter of informant committed suicide by hanging herself on account of mental agony caused to her. Learned counsel further submits that false and frivolous allegations have been made. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that a compromise was also made in the police station regarding flirting of informant's daughter. There are material contradictions in the two statements of informant. No such incident was occurred. There is no eye witness of the alleged incident. No one had seen the alleged occurrence of flirting of informant's daughter and also no one had seen the alleged occurrence of abusing and threatening given by applicant and his family members. The applicant and his entire family has been roped in the present proceeding with ulterior motive and village rivalry. Learned counsel further argued that applicant is innocent and she Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Raj Singh Tomar, Kavita Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rohit Nandan Singh Rani Devi @ Ranno .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) has an apprehension that she may be arrested in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against her. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to cooperate during investigation and trial and she would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, she shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail. He further submits that in the matter charge sheet was filed on 25.01.2025 and even on 09.09.2025 non bailable warrant has also been issued against the applicant by the court concerned, but there is nothing on record to demonstrate that she is appearing before the court concerned, therefore she does not deserves for relief of anticipatory bail. 5. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that non bailable warrant has already been issued against the applicant and there is nothing on record to demonstrate that she is appearing before the court concerned, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. September 24, 2025 Mustaqeem. NABAIL No. 7596 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad