HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31878 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The petitioner claims that he has constructed the house over abadi. Proceedings for eviction was initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in which, an eviction order was passed. Petitioner claims the order to be an ex-parte order. He moved a restoration application which was dismissed by the revenue authority on 24.03.2025. The petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In the memo of appeal, apart from the fact that the construction has been made over the abadi land, no other ground has been taken. The appellate authority after noting the fact that Arazi No. 33 is a public utility land and is recorded in the revenue record as the land of the Gaon Sabha. Perusing the report of the revenue officials, the appellate authority had proceeded to dismiss the appeal and upheld the order of the Tehsildar. 2. No case for interference is made out. 3. The writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. September 12, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Mishra, Radhe Shyam Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Chhedi Saw @ Mahendra Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad