Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95223 (ALL)

KSHAMANAND DOHRE v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/13690/2025 · 2025-09-18

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13690 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for restoration of his pay after the period of withdrawal of increment has come to an end and consequential revision of pension. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 2 vide representation dated 22.04.2025 which is still pending consideration. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. September 19, 2025 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Kshamanand Dohre .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad