Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95219 (PNJ)

RAMESH CHANDER VAID @ RAMESH CHAND v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/47606/2025 · 2025-08-29

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-47606-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRM-M-47606-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.08.2025 Ramesh Chander Vaid @ Ramesh Chand ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kooner, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Singla, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J.(ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 528, BNSS, 2023, for quashing of order dated 01.09.2023, in case bearing CHI/2840/2019 arising out of FIR No.35 dated 18.01.2008, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 29 DLF, District Gurugram, vide which the bail bonds and surety bonds of the petitioner were cancelled and forfeited to state and non-bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner. The relevant facts of the present case for adjudication are that the petitioner is facing trial in the afore-said case and had been granted bail by trial Court on 25.01.2017. On 10.01.2023 the petitioner became absent before the trial Court and on 01.09.2023 his non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued by the trial Court and his bail bonds and surety bonds were cancelled and forfeited to State. JYOTI 2025.08.29 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-47606-2025 2 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial Court. The absence of the petitioner was neither intentional nor deliberate. Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner is ready to surrender before the trial Court. Therefore, the impugned order dated 01.09.2023 be set aside. Heard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and taking note of the fact that trial of the case is likely to take time and no useful purpose is likely to be served by sending him behind the bars, the impugned order dated 01.09.2023 is set aside. The petitioner is directed to surrender and appear before the trial Court within 10 days and on doing so, they would be released on bail on furnishing his fresh bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and with the undertaking to appear regularly before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing, subject to depositing of Rs. 10,000/- with DLSA, Gurugram. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 29.08.2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) jyoti3 JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No JYOTI 2025.08.29 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document