HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31825 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to make necessary correction in the description of second respondent forthwith. 2. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Ravi Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the Varanasi Development Authority. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not go to private respondent No. 3. 4. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to the respondent no. 2 to conclude the proceedings under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Planning and Development Act, 1973. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the complainant, who made a complaint to the Varanasi Development Authority regarding illegal construction raised by private respondent no. 3. In pith and substance, the petitioner is praying that a direction be issued to the Vice-Chairman, Varanasi Development Authority to finalise the proceedings under Section 27 of the Act, 1973. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Pandey Manju Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) any such proceedings are pending before the second respondent, it is expected that the said proceedings may be finalized as per law. September 12, 2025 Kirti WRIC No. 31825 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad