COCP-3744 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204 Jagtar Singh and others Jaspreet Kaur Talwar and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 30.08.2010 Court in LPA Punjab through Chief Secretary to Govt. of Punjab an connected matters ‘minimum of the allowances as revised from time to time 2. petitioners petitioners except contempt application filed for impleadment of his LRs was allowed by this Court vide order dated amount qua deceased/ LRs. 3744-2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 1 Jagtar Singh and others Versus Jaspreet Kaur Talwar and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. ID Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 30.08.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed Court in LPA-10-2004, titled as ‘Sarup Singh and others Punjab through Chief Secretary to Govt. of Punjab an connected matters, whereby the petitioners were held entitled minimum of the pay scale of the categories to which they belong with all allowances as revised from time to time’. It is very fairly admitted by learned counsel for that the payment has been released petitioners except contempt-petitioner No. 11, who has expired and application filed for impleadment of his LRs was allowed by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2024. It is, therefore, amount qua deceased/petitioner No. 11-Mahinder Singh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3744-2019 Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed by a Division Bench of this Sarup Singh and others vs. The State of Punjab through Chief Secretary to Govt. of Punjab and others’and other the petitioners were held entitled to pay scale of the categories to which they belong with all It is very fairly admitted by learned counsel for the the payment has been released to all the contempt- petitioner No. 11, who has expired and application filed for impleadment of his LRs was allowed by this Court . It is, therefore, submitted that the due Mahinder Singh be released to his The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order by a Division Bench of this The State of and other pay scale of the categories to which they belong with all the petitioner No. 11, who has expired and application filed for impleadment of his LRs was allowed by this Court due be released to his RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.19 20:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3744 3. 4. the petitioners present petition is petitioner No. 11 to move an appropriate application which shall be considered in accordance with law by the respondents. 5. 6. 17.09.2025 rishu 3744-2019 -2- Heard. In view of the afore-noted submission the petitioners, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is being disposed of, with liberty to the LRs of deceased/ petitioner No. 11 to move an appropriate application which shall be considered in accordance with law by the respondents. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable submission of learned counsel for is required to be passed; and the with liberty to the LRs of deceased/ petitioner No. 11 to move an appropriate application which shall be considered in accordance with law by the respondents. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No is required to be passed; and the with liberty to the LRs of deceased/ petitioner No. 11 to move an appropriate application which shall be RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.19 20:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.