1 2025:CGHC:8536 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1309 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sharda Sharma W/o Chandrasekhar Sharma Aged About 50 Years Occupation Sahayak Sikchak L.B. Saskiya Prathmik Shala Bodri, Niwasi- Ward No. 2 Bodri, Tehsil Bilha, Jila- Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Sachiv, School Siksha Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Sachiv Panchayat, Gramin Vikash Evam Shram Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Jila Siksha Adhikari Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Mukhay Karyapalan Adhikari Janpad Panchayat Kota, District- Bilaspur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 19/02/2025 Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “10.1 यह कि, उ्ቈरवादीगण ो किदशित किया जावे कि वे राज्य ास ्ቛारा जारी परिरप्ቔ किदां 10.03.2017 और ्ቦीमती सोा साहू किवरू्ቍ छ.ग. ास वगैरह में माीय डि(वीज बेंच ्ቛारा पारिरत आदे किदां 28.02.2024 े परिरपाल में 10 व्ቧ. ी सेवा अवडि1 पूण. रे पर मो्ቐत वेतमा मय एरिरयस. राशि े भुगता रे कियमाुसार अकिवलंब ाय.वाही रे। 10.2 यह कि, उ्ቈरवादीगण ो किदशित किया जावे कि वे याडिचात7 ी ए ही पद पर अवरत ी जा रही सेवा अवडि1 ी गणा र कियमाुसार मो्ቐत / उ्ሴतर वेतमा ा भुगता एरिरयस. वेत राशि सहीत मय ब्याज अकिवलंब भुगता सुकिडि:त रें। 10.3 यह कि, अन्य अुतो्ቧ जो माीय न्यायालय उडिचत समझे उ्ቈरवादीगण से याडिचात7 ो किदलाया जावें।" 2. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman after completion of 10 years of her service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue as such the petitioner is also entitled for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent 3 authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No.2 & 3 /competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3 /competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat