Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9517 (AP)

SIMMA KISHORE v. CHUKKA ASHOK KUMAR

CRP/717/2020 · 2025-07-17

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010105232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 717/2020 Between: 1. SIMMA KISHORE, S/O. ESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEAR, RUNNING NOODLES SHOP IN THE NAME AND STYLE AS SRI SAI DURGA SPICY AND TASTY FAST FOODS AT DOOR NO.8-6-10, CHINA WALTAIR, OPP. POLICE QUARTERS, CHINA WALTAIR, MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHUKKA ASHOK KUMAR, S/o. late Suryanarayana, Hindu, aged 55 years, resident of DNo.8-25-10/ 1, Tamil Street, China Waltair, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of C.R.P. under Article 227 of Constitution of India being aggrieved by the Docket Orders in E.A. No.42 of 2019 in E.P. No.79 of 2019 in O.S. No.614 of 2017, dated 20-02-2020 on the -file of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY of all further proceedings in E.A. No.42 of 2019 in E.P. No.79 of 2019 in O.S. No.614 of 2017, dated 20-02-2020 on the File of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NH AKBAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for consideration on 04.07.2025 & 11.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. In that view of matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.18.07.2025 DSB 210 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.717 of 2020 Date 18.07.2025 U DSB