Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95164 (PNJ)

SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/26079/2025 · 2025-09-03

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AT CHANDIGARH 147 CWP-26079-2025 DECIDED ON: 03.09.2025 SATISH KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate with Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ****** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that this Hon'ble Court may issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned final result dated 28.05.2025 (Annexue P-6) vide which the petitioner has not been selected despite crossing the cut-of under their categories: further a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the respondent No.4 to cooperate with the respondents No.2 and 5 in verification of the gradation certificate of the petitioner in accordance with law; further a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the respondent No.5 to recommend the name of petitioner for the post of Group D in case he is found eligible and grant all notional benefits to the petitioner including seniority and other benefits. VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.03 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CWP-26079-2025 2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 03.09.2025 JUDGE viipin Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.03 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order