NAWAB AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/20474/2025 · 2025-10-09
Prashant Mishra I, Siddharth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20474 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. Amendment application filed by learned counsel for the petitioners, is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri S.K. Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri K.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and learned AGA for State-respondents. Counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be permitted to make necessary amendment in the writ petition. The amendment application is allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary amendment in the writ petition during the course of day. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 19.05.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0314 of 2025, under sections- 126(2), 352, 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(2) & 117(3) of B.N.S., 2023 and, Police Station- Navabganj, District - Bareilly, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that counterblast implication of petitioners by respondent no. 2 is alleged. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Mishra, Hari Om Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Karunesh Narayan Tripathi Nawab Ahmad And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
With regard to the allegations made in the F.I.R., investigating officer of the police is investigating the matter. After hearing the rival contentions, totality of facts and circumstances of this case and in view of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ petition No. 7463/2024 (Shobit Nehra Vs. State of U.P.), the above noted writ petition is disposed of directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of this case within period of 60 days. During the period of investigation and till cognizance is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioners shall not be arrested. In case of non-cooperation with the police investigation by the petitioners, it shall be open for either of the respondents to file recall application of this order. October 10, 2025 A. Mandhani CRLP No. 20474 of 2025 2 (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad