Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95155 (MAD)

MURUGESAN v. The State Rep by

CRL OP/25478/2025 · 2025-09-22

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.25478 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No. 25478 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.17242 of 2025 Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep By: 1. The Inspector of Police, Varanjaram Police Station, Kallakurichi District, Crime No.388 of 2024. 2. Rahamadullah ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.388 of 2024 on the file of the 1st respondent-Police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.W.Cleetus For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 O R D E R Page Nos.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25478 of 2025 This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.388 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 312 and 324(2) of BNS, on the file of the 1st respondent-Police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record. 3. The allegations in the FIR in Crime No.388 of 2024, clearly indicate that on 30.11.2024, some unknown persons have made an attempt to commit dacoity, in the said process, they have damaged CCTV cameras and the lights which were installed in the shed of de-facto complainant. As per the prosecution, the investigation is going on. 4. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the petitioner's name has not been found in the FIR and in the original complaint. Only based on the confession given by Panner Selvam and Shanmugam, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences. 5. At the outset, this Court is of the view that investigation is on Page Nos.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25478 of 2025 and part of such huge crime is unearthed and hence, this Court does not find any merit in the present petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To 1. The Inspector of Police, Varanjaram Police Station, Kallakurichi District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page Nos.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25478 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. ms Crl.O.P.No.25478 of 2025 22.09.2025 Page Nos.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis