Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95153 (ALL)

SMT REHANA PARVEEN AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/30493/2024 · 2025-03-16

Saurabh Srivastava

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37755 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30493 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Rehana Parveen And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohit Shukla Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 4. After perusal of the records, it transpires that there is hardly any case made out for extension of protection in favour of the petitioners since the married couple, as stated by learned counsel for the petitioners, are residing at District-Pilibhit and the in-laws of petitioner no. 2 are residing at District-Rampur. 5. So far as other issues are concerned, which has been submitted by learned counsel for respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 are concerned, the relevant documents were related to the petitioners which has been received by learned Standing Counsel for the State through instructions may be provided to learned counsel for respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6, specifically report dated 17.10.2024. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. 7. Personal appearance of respondent no. 4-Mumtaz Ali Khan is hereby dispensed with. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad