AAMIR ALI SHEIKH AND ANR. v. MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN MIR (REVENUE)
CCP(S)/469/2024 · 2025-04-28
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9515 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9515 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 182 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 469/2024 In WP(C) 2355/2024 Aamir Ali Sheikh & Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Taha Khaleel, Advocate. Vs. Mohammad Hussain Mir.
...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 28.04.2025
1. Mr. Taha Khaleel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order which is sought to be complied with through the medium of the instant contempt petition, has been complied with and accordingly, he has instructions not to the press the instant contempt petition. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the above, the instant contempt petition is closed as not pressed and the rule, if any, shall also stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR: 28.04.2025
“HAMID”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 28.04.2025