IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4015 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Rakesh Sharma & others …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Precisely, the grouse of the petitioners as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioners is that representation having been filed by the petitioners (Annexure P-12) for redressal of their grievance, as has been raised in the instant petition has been not decided despite repeated requests. 2. While putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, Mr. B.C.Verma, learned Additional Advocate General representing the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondents states that representation, if not already decided, shall be decided expeditiously. 3. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-12 ) of the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass detailed speaking order thereupon, taking note of the judgments annexed with the petition (Annexures P-10 & P-11), wherein issue otherwise sought to be decided in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if they still remain aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 21,2025 (shankar)