Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95140 (ALL)

SMT. RESHMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32403/2025 · 2025-10-07

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32403 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus for abating the entire proceeding of Ceiling Case No.3204/76 in view of section 3 of the Repeal Act, 1999. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner. iii. Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. iv. Allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the petitioner." 3. The petitioner has remedy of filing application before the competent authority for getting the Ceiling Case No.3204/76 abated after promulgation of Repeal Act, 1999. 4. In such view of the fact, we dismiss the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the competent authority to get the Ceiling Case No.3204/76 abated. October 8, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Reshma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad