Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95123 (ALL)

MUKUL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13683/2025 · 2025-09-11

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13683 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri B.M. Shukla, learned counsel for respondents. 2. With the consent of rival parties, at this stage, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that since departmental proceedings has been initiated probably on similar circumstances on which an FIR was also lodged against the petitioner, therefore, at this stage, respondents have to take a decision whether to continue a departmental proceedings or not in terms of judgment passed by Supreme Court in Capt. M. Paul Anthony vs. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. and Another, (1999) 3 SCC 679, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that concerned respondents will take a reasoned decision whether to continue departmental proceedings or not in terms of Capt. M. Paul Anthony (supra) as well as concerned U.P. Police Regulations. September 12, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Ojha, Shiv Poojan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Mukul Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad