KUSHALRAJ GIRI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER
NA528/34757/2025 · 2025-09-10
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34757 of 2025 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Satyaver Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Sandeep Chaudhary, learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. SC/1066/2024, State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Kushalraj Giri and others, CNR - UPME010123302024, arising out of case crime no.0571 of 2021 dated 31.07.2021, under Sections-498A, 323, 352, 354, 504, 506, 376 and 511 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, 1961, Police Station-Kankarkhera, District-Meerut, pending in the court of Additional District Judge, FTC, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that applicant no.1 is the husband of opposite party no.2 and applicant no.2 is the mother-in-law of opposite party no.2. Dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature and now they have settled their dispute amicably and a written compromise dated 25.11.2024 has also been entered into between the parties. It is further submitted that the aforesaid compromise has already been filed before the court below and a request has been made that on the basis of the written compromise, impugned proceedings may be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer on the ground that the aforesaid compromise is yet to be verified by the court below. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions of both the parties, the present application is disposed of with direction to the court below to verify the aforesaid compromise after summoning the parties within a period of two months from the date of receiving copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anita Yadav, Kushalraj Giri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kushalraj Giri And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh, Through Principal Secretary Home Department And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
After verification of the aforesaid compromise, court below will permit the parties to obtain certified copy of the same. 6. After verification of the compromise, court below will dispose of the impugned proceeding, in accordance with law. 7. For a period of two months or till verification of compromise, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 8.
It is further provided that applicants are at liberty to file fresh application u/s 528 B.N.S.S., if required, to quash the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified compromise. September 11, 2025 S.C. NA528 No. 34757 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad