Kolli Subba Rao v. The Govt of AP., rep.by District Collector
WP/27060/2007 · 2025-02-17
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9509 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9509 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010105782007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27060/2007 Between:
1. Kolli Subba Rao and others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Govt of AP rep by District Collector, Krishna District at Machilipatnam and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CH B R P SEKHAR
2. . Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners possession to an extent of Ac.0.73 cents in Survey No146/2 of Surepalli Village, Musunuru Mandal, without any notice, acquisition and forcibly trying to dispossess them, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.
2 CGR, J. W.P. No.27060 of 2007
2. This Court on 18.12.2007 passed interim order directing the respondents to maintain status quo with regard to possession of the subject land.
3. Later, based on memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, informing that the 1st petitioner died, the writ petition against him was dismissed as abated on 20.12.2024.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents places on record written instructions, dated 13.02.2025, stating that though the subject land was initially proposed for acquisition for providing house sites to the poor under Indiramma Housing Scheme and in as much as there were certain inter se disputes over the subject land among the petitioners, they thought it fit not to proceed with acquiring the said land and further that the respondents never interfered with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land and therefore, prays to dismiss the writ petition.
5. Having regard to the written instructions placed on record, which categorically state that the respondents are not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners as the said land is no more needed for the purpose which initially proposed for, recording
3 CGR, J. W.P. No.27060 of 2007
the same, as the cause in the writ petition no more survives, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:17.02.2025. cs