DEEPU TIWARI ALIAS DEEPAK TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2826/2025 · 2025-07-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9506 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9506 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17441] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2826 of 2025
------ Deepu Tiwari @ Deepak Tiwari, Aged about 26 years, S/o Ramesh Tiwari, R/o Village- Pratap Nagar, Mahuadanr, P.S. & P.S.: Mahuadanr, District: Latehar. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-01-07-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahuadanr P.S. Case No.46 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 107 of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner abated the suicide of Sejal Kumari Singh and the only act which is attributed to the petitioner is that he chided Sejal Kumari Singh for going to the birthday party organized in the home of a boy outside the village and slapped her. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that such a small incident cannot lead deceased to take BP medicine which resulted in her suicide. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.01.2025 as is evident from para-05 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-06 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Latehar in connection with Mahuadanr P.S. Case No.46 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. In view of disposal of this bail application, I.A. No.5141 of 2025 is
disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/