259 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24920-2025 Date of Decision: September 09, 2025 M/S VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES ..... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondent No. 1. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. **** LISA GILL, J. 1. Prayer in this writ petition is for setting aside rejection of bids submitted by petitioners on 11.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 (Annexures P-1 and P- 2). 2. Learned counsel for respondents submit that this writ petition is rendered infructuous as all three tenders (DNIT) have been withdrawn on 04.09.2025. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner while acknowledging that petitioner too has received e-mail dated 04.09.2025 that tenders in question have been cancelled, submits that action taken by respondents in rejecting its bids was RITU SHARMA 2025.09.15 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24920-2025 -2- incorrect. However, he is unable to deny that present writ petition is indeed rendered infructuous in view of withdrawal of said tenders and any adjudication shall be an entirely academic exercise. 4. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous without expression of any opinion on merits of the matter. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) September 09, 2025 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.09.15 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document