Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94993 (ALL)

SHIVRAM SAHU v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/31664/2025 · 2025-09-10

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31664 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. It is an admitted case of the petitioner that he is occupying the land of Gata No. 139, measuring 0.364 Hectare, which in the revenue record has been recorded as 'navin parti'. In the objection filed before the revenue authority in proceedings under Section 67, the petitioner has admitted about the encroachment having been made by him and house having been constructed. In para 5 of the objection, the petitioner has claimed that the benefit under Section 67A may be extended to him. Both the revenue authorities have recorded concurrent finding and has found that the petitioner in unauthorized occupation of the land in dispute which is recorded as 'navin parti' which is land of the Gaon Sabha. 3. Having heard the counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, no case for interference is made in the order impugned. 4. However, in case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67A claiming the benefit before the revenue authority within 15 days from today, the same shall be dealt with by the revenue authorities strictly in accordance with law within next one month. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Fakhruzzaman Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deepak Gaur (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Shivram Sahu .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad