Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94983 (PNJ)

KULBIR KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/9458/2025 · 2025-09-01

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 111 Kulbir Kaur and another State of Punjab & others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The petitioners namely approached this Court under Article seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respon Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private responden representation dated at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2 (Rural), District The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-945 Date of decision: 01.09.2025 Kulbir Kaur and another VERSUS & others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Bhupinder Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. r. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Kulbir Kaur approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respon Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P-4 at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the tioners to the respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police District Amritsar. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9458-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 01.09.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate, for the petitioners. r. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. Kulbir Kaur and Amandeep Singh have of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and ts are threatening the petitioners. A 4) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Amritsar The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.01 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 111 CRWP-9458 Pursua Additional Advocate General notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to th As such, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No. Amritsar Rural, District Amritsar petitioners as set out in the p dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above Station House Officer, Police Station District Amritsar The petition is disposed of. September 01, 2025. Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 9458-2025(O&M) Pursuant to supply of advance copy, M Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. As such, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Amritsar Rural, District Amritsar to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation 1.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has en/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No. Station House Officer, Police Station Ajnala, District Amritsar Rural, District Amritsar, for requisite compliance. The petition is disposed of. September 01, 2025. (VINOD S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 e copy, Mr. Saurav Verma, learned who is present in the Court, accepts Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction e petitioners is given. As such, the petition is disposed of with the directions to tation House Officer, Police Station Ajnala, District to look into the grievances of the etition and also expressed in the representation and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has en/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with said representation to respondent No.3- Ajnala, District Amritsar Rural, (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.01 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document