Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94983 (ALL)

SMT REEMA ALIAS REENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/34850/2025 · 2025-09-10

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34850 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 02.08.2025 along with cognizance order dated 08.08.2025 and entire proceedings of the case arising out of Case Crime No.161 of 2025 (State Vs. Phool Chandra and others), under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 3(5), 115(2), 109, 131, 121(2), 121(1), 324(4), 126(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), 61(2) BNS and Section 7 of CLA Act and Section 3(2)(e) of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Bardah, District Azamgarh, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No.19, Azamgarh. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR, chargesheet, injury reports and statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS as well as impugned order, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt Reema Alias Reena And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 11, 2025 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 34850 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad