HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31823 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Nitin Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Sarwar Ali Siddique, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 15. 2. The order dated 28.03.2025/02.04.2025 passed by the respondent No.3/Authorized Officer/Prescribed Authority, Payment of Wages Act, Gautam Budh Nagar is under challenge. 3. Today when the matter is taken up, a preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents that against the aforesaid order, statutory remedy is available to the petitioner to file appeal as provided under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1963 before the Appellate Authority. 4. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. September 19, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitin Sharma, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sarwar Ali Siddique (Prakash Padia,J.) M/S A.P.V. Realty Ltd. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad