IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64326 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Rudal Yadav S/o Mukhlal Yadav R/o vill - West Pakuhawa, ward no. 2, P.S.- Purushotampur, Distt.- West Champaran 2. Aala Yadav S/o Mukhlal Yadav R/o vill - West Pakuhawa, ward no. 2, P.S.- Purushotampur, Distt.- West Champaran 3. Mukesh Yadav S/o Khublal Yadav R/o vill - West Pakuhawa, ward no. 2, P.S.- Purushotampur, Distt.- West Champaran 4. Khublal Yadav S/o Late Raghunath Yadav R/o vill - West Pakuhawa, ward no. 2, P.S.- Purushotampur, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 01.06.2025 at about 6:30 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted brother of informant, namely Dharmendra Yadav, by means of fist and slap. When the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64326 of 2025(2) dt.16-09-2025 2/3 informant intervened, Petitioner No. 1inflicted farsa blow on the head of informant, Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 along with co- accused Mukhlal Yadav assaulted him with lathi and Petitioner No. 4 snatched Rs. 8,000/- from his pocket. It is further alleged that Petitioner No. 3 and co-accused Mukhlal Yadav assaulted wife of informant and Petitioner No. 1 disrobed her. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, informant of this case forcibly abducted wife of Petitioner No. 2 and got married due to which maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has opined the injuries, sustained by the injured, as simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64326 of 2025(2) dt.16-09-2025 3/3 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Mainatad P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T