Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9496 (ALL)

ARVIND SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/2155/2025 · 2025-03-19

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40596 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2155 of 2025 Applicant :- Arvind Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ayush Mishra,Yogendra Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ramesh Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 294 of 2023, registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station- Sector 63 Noida, District- Gautam Buddh Nagar, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Allegation in the first information report is in regard to payment of money. It is a civil nature dispute. He next submitted that similarly placed co-accused, Ashok has been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.12.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41002 of 2024 and claims parity with co-accused. Applicant has no criminal history to his credit. Applicant is languishing in jail since 21.11.2024. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submits that applicant has promised before the Trial Court that he would make payment to informant but till today, no payment has been made. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Arvind Singh, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad