RAHUL GOEL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/31837/2025 · 2025-09-11
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31837 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. It is a matter of record, as submitted by learned counsel for petitioners, that the petitioners are not living together; petitioner no. 2 is residing with his parents, while petitioner no. 1 is residing at his own separate address. In view of these circumstances, the relief sought in the present petition cannot be granted.
4. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. September 12, 2025 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Rahul Goel And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad