2025:UHC:6642-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA Writ Petition (S/B) No. 311 of 2025 30th July, 2025 Dr. Sabarinath S. ………..Petitioner Versus Union of India …….Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for appellant. Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Union of India. 2. Learned Central Government Standing Counsel, at the outset, raises a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. 4. In the event the petitioner prefer’s an 2025:UHC:6642-DB 2 application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, the same shall be considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer limit of nine months. (G. NARENDAR, C. J.) (ALOK MAHRA, J.) Dated: 30.07.2025 Mamta