Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94940 (PNJ)

VXXXX v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/54150/2023 · 2025-08-06

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

232. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT VXXXX State of Haryana CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to assign the investigation of case FIR No.92, dated 16.11.2022, under Sections 376(2)(n), 384, 506 IPC, registered at Women Police (Annexure P local police of District Panchkula, so that proper, fair, independent and impartial investigation may be 2. was passed: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioner. Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Senior DAG, Haryana. ------ NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to assign the investigation of case FIR No.92, dated 16.11.2022, under Sections 376(2)(n), 384, 506 IPC, registered at Women Police Station, Panchkula, District Panchkula (Annexure P-1), to some independent Investigating local police of District Panchkula, so that proper, fair, independent and impartial investigation may be conducted. On the last date of hearing i.e. 24.02.2025, the following order was passed:- “Learned State counsel submits that the untraced report has been presented before the trial Court on 28.10.2024 and notice to the complainant was issued for 07.12.2024. Thereafter, the matter has been Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 06.08.2025. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-54150-2023 Date of decision: 06.08.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Senior DAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to assign the investigation of case FIR No.92, dated 16.11.2022, under Sections 376(2)(n), 384, 506 IPC, Station, Panchkula, District Panchkula to some independent Investigating Agency other than the local police of District Panchkula, so that proper, fair, independent and ing i.e. 24.02.2025, the following order Learned State counsel submits that the untraced report has been presented before the trial Court on 28.10.2024 and notice to the complainant was issued for 07.12.2024. Thereafter, the matter has been adjourned for 03.05.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 06.08.2025.” 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to assign the investigation of case FIR No.92, dated 16.11.2022, under Sections 376(2)(n), 384, 506 IPC, Station, Panchkula, District Panchkula Agency other than the local police of District Panchkula, so that proper, fair, independent and ing i.e. 24.02.2025, the following order Learned State counsel submits that the untraced report has been presented before the trial Court on 28.10.2024 and notice to the complainant was issued for 07.12.2024. SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.08.07 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-54150-2023 - 2 - 3. Learned State counsel submits that since the untraced report has already been presented before the trial Court, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner can pursue her remedy before the trial Court. 4. No one was present on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing. Even today, position is the same. 5. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file protest petition before the trial Court, if so aggrieved. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE August 06, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.08.07 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document