Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9493 (BOM)

VISHAL RAJU KHILE v. SANDHYA VISHAL KHILE

WP/2977/2016 · 2025-01-14

Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 938-wp-2977-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 938 WRIT PETITION NO. 2977 OF 2016 Vishal Raju Khile ….Petitioner VERSUS Sandhya Vishal Khile …..Respondent ….. Mr. Ketan Pote h/f Mr. A.G. Ambetkar, Advocate for the Petitioner ....... CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the by way of present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the interim maintenance granted to the respondent. However, according to him substantive proceeding had already been disposed of by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar. In view of the same, writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In that view of the matter, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:993