IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 213 Jai Gopal Dhiman Smt. Kimal Mittal, Administrative Complex, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated of this Court in CWP State of Punjab and others”, vide which the direction was issued to the respondents representations submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law. as assured by the learned State counsel, the needful shall be done within the time indicated above…..”. learned State counsel has already filed Reply dated 24.5.2024 in the COCP-3339-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3339 of 2023 Date of decision : Jai Gopal Dhiman Versus Smt. Kimal Mittal, The Deputy Commissioner, District Administrative Complex, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 29.5.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by a of this Court in CWP-PIL-46-2023 titled as “ State of Punjab and others”, vide which the direction was issued to the respondents-authorities “….to consider and deal with the representations submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law. as assured by the learned State counsel, the needful shall be done within the time indicated above…..”. In pursuance of notice of motion issued by this Court, learned State counsel has already filed Reply dated 24.5.2024 in the 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3339 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-25.08.2025 …..Petitioner The Deputy Commissioner, District Administrative Complex, Chandigarh Road, Hoshiarpur and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying ) passed by a Division Bench titled as “Jai Gopal Dhiman vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the direction was issued to the “….to consider and deal with the representations submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law. This Court is sanguine that as assured by the learned State counsel, the needful shall be done In pursuance of notice of motion issued by this Court, learned State counsel has already filed Reply dated 24.5.2024 in the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.26 18.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken on record. Learned counsel for the State undertakes to supply copy of the said reply to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate p that necessary compliance has been made while passing a Speaking Order dated 16.2.2024 (Annexure R the present petition. passed in the present petition, the same is August 25 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3339-2023 (O & M) Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken on record. Learned counsel for the State undertakes to supply copy of the said reply to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper Learned counsel for the respondents that necessary compliance has been made while passing a Speaking Order dated 16.2.2024 (Annexure R-1/T); thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 5, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken on record. Learned counsel for the State undertakes to supply copy of the said reply to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry lace in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the respondents-State also submits that necessary compliance has been made while passing a Speaking 1/T); thus, no cause survives in , no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.26 18.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document