Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94916 (ALL)

INDAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA528/34839/2025 · 2025-09-10

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34839 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions received from his client submits that though the application u/s 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicant to set aside the order dated 08.07.2025 passed by learned learned trial court i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no.-Ι, Gorakhpur whereby the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. along with non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant and further be pleased to direct the learned trial court to consider the bail application of the applicant, however, he confines his relief for consideration of the bail in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51. 2. Sri Pankaj Kumar Rai, learned State Law Officer has no objection to the same. 3. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land keeping in view the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). September 11, 2025 piyush Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Indal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad