GOLLA SATISH BABU v. MAMIDI BATTULA VENKATESWARA RAO
CRP/1011/2024 · 2025-07-02
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9491 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010104722024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1011 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the Offer dated 06.02.2024 in lA. No. 56/2024 in OS. No. 203/2012 on the file of the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam, Krishha District Between: Golla Satish Babu, S/o. Venkata Nancharaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Bypass Road, Edepalli, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. Petitioner AND
1. Mamidi Battula Venkateswara Rao, S/o Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged about 67 years, Business, R/o Rustumbada, Behind Municipal Park, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 2. Mamidibattula Anjaneyulu, S/o Radhakrishna Murchy, Aged about 62 years. Business, R/o Rustumbada, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3. Mamidibattula Prasada Rao, S/o Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged about ef years. Business, R/o Rustumbada, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4. Mamidibattula Ramu, S/o Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged about 57 yeafe Business, R/o Rustumbada, Behind Municipal Park, Machilipatnarri ; Krishna District. ^ ^ 1 Behind Municipal Park t Behind Municipal Park r-i- ■
r Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2024 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
“, ■* in tt|e^affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to / Ki. :'m. grant*s% of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 203/2012 on the file of the Court of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District pending disposal of main Revision Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: The Court made the following order: • ■■ ■1 ■■ ■ '.V t -f :V <• \ ;; . 'i ■ < r. i ■:
i O V •, - -u; c. i 5 x' ■.f ■\ ••V'. • :;v •i' 'j '•:v V, • -j r , - ‘ 7 :
71 APHC010104722024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1011/2024 Between:
1.GOLLA SATISH BABU, S/0. VENKATA NANCHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/0. BYPASS ROAD, EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.MAMIDI BATTULA VENKATESWARA RAO, RAO, S/0 RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/0 RUSTUMBADA, BEHIND MUNICIPAL PARK, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2.MAMIDIBATTULA ANJANEYULU, , S/0 RADHAKRISHNA MURCHY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/0 RUSTUMBADA, BEHIND MUNICIPAL PARK, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.MAMIDIBATTULA PRASADA RAO, , S/0 RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/0 RUSTUMBADA, BEHIND MUNICIPAL PARK, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1 >0 4.MAMIDIBATTULA RAMU, S/0 RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, YEARS. BUSINESS, R/0 MUNICIPAL PARK, AGED ABOUT 57 RUSTUMBADA, BEHIND MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPleased to set aside order 06-02-2024 in I.A.No.56/2024 in O.S.No.203/2012 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District consequently Re-open the Suit by allowing I.A.No.56/2024 and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2024 dated Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No. 203/2012 on the file of the .Court of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District pending disposal of main Revision Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following;
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1011 of 2024
ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive.
2. The said submission is placed on record. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR - •' i' //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER / To,
1. The Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam District
2. One CC to SRI NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEN/A Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies Krishna gsg ‘V.
'/■ :••• N. ■V HIGH COURT -rf f i- DATED: 03/07/2025 . .1. -ir ■S' / sy <
ORDER CRP NO. 1011 OF 2024 gO'FANOH^ o o o 7 2 JUl 2r5 X Co o ^ . Current SeGiion X' 4:. I f,-. \ o. I j' DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS i 4.!j 0 , XV.; • .■I cv-r