Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9489 (UTT)

MADARSA DARUL ULOOM SABRIYA SATTARIYA SIRAJIYA SOCIETY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2249/2025 · 2025-07-29

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 19 WPMS No.2249 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a Registered Trust, which was registered on 07.06.2011. The property has been sealed on 22.03.2025 without following due procedure of law. It may be unsealed. The petitioner is ready to give an undertaking that he will not run any Madarsa in the premises in question. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the premises has been illegally sealed by the respondents authority without following due procedure of law, without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner; the petitioner is ready to give an undertaking that he will not run any Madarsa in the premises in question unless he is authorised to do so by the State Government. Learned State Counsel submits that if the petitioner gives such undertaking, the petition may be disposed of in terms thereof. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to the respondents authority to unseal the premises in question, subject to the petitioner giving an undertaking that he will not run any Madarsa in the premises, unless he is authorised to do so by the State Government. In case the petitioner makes any defiance to the undertaking given by him, the respondents authority shall be free to take such action, as is permissible under law. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 29.07.2025 RV