CRWP-15-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206(1) ASHA DEVI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Ashir Gulati Mr. Tarun Deora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for respondents no.5 to 7. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed respondents no. no.4 along with police party personal propert away. 2. Learned State counsel has referred to status report dated 13.02.2025, filed on behalf of Mr. Inderpal Chohan, Deputy Superintendent of Police Patiala, which is to the following effect: 7. took away 4 CCTV cameras, DVR, two WIFI modems along with gold bracelets etc. are not an iota of truth in it. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Decided On: ASHA DEVI Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Ashir Gulati, Advocate and Mr. Tarun Deora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for respondents no.5 to 7. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the petitioner’ along with police party have been raiding personal properties including CCTV Cameras Learned State counsel has referred to status report dated , filed on behalf of respondents no.1, 3 and 4 Chohan, Deputy Superintendent of Police , which is to the following effect: 7. That all the allegations levelled in the petition regarding took away 4 CCTV cameras, DVR, two WIFI modems along with gold bracelets etc. are totally false and frivolous and there is not an iota of truth in it. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-15-2025 Decided On: 09.09.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. inter alia, seeking a direction to to protect the petitioner’s life and liberty as respondent have been raiding her house, wherein her including CCTV Cameras, DVR, etc. have been taken Learned State counsel has referred to status report dated respondents no.1, 3 and 4 by way of affidavit of Chohan, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Circle Patran, District That all the allegations levelled in the petition regarding took away 4 CCTV cameras, DVR, two WIFI modems along totally false and frivolous and there is seeking a direction to respondent er have been taken Learned State counsel has referred to status report dated by way of affidavit of , Circle Patran, District That all the allegations levelled in the petition regarding took away 4 CCTV cameras, DVR, two WIFI modems along totally false and frivolous and there is Aman Dua 2025.09.12 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CRWP-15-2025 8. the petitioner is concerned, the Senior Superintendent of Police Patiala vide his directed the deponent to assess the prescription to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Hence, the deponent deputed SHO PS Shutrana to submit report. SHO PS Shutrana went to the house of petitioner in Village Karim Nagar and also joined Kulwan Surjit Ram, and other respectable persons of the village, but the house of petitioner was found locked and none of member were available. Statements of respectables were recorded and they disc petitioner and her husband Gurcharn Ram etc. are not residing in the village and the respectable joined were apprised about the orders of the Hon'ble High Court and advised them to inform the police as and when the peti Hence, SHO PS Shutrana recommended for consigning the petition to record room. Accordingly, he address, and her allegations etc. are also false. 3. The facts have not been disputed by the petitioner by filing any counter-affidavit. 4. It is apparent that respondents regarding taking away the DVR etc. facie established whereabouts are not known. 5. Accordingly petitioner that can be brought to 2025 -2- 8. That as far as regarding the threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner is concerned, the Senior Superintendent of Police Patiala vide his order no.4611 directed the deponent to assess the prescription to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Hence, the deponent deputed SHO PS Shutrana to submit report. SHO PS Shutrana went to the house of petitioner in Village Karim Nagar and also joined Kulwant Singh Sarpanch of the Village along with Namberdar Surjit Ram, and other respectable persons of the village, but the house of petitioner was found locked and none of member were available. Statements of respectables were recorded and they disclosed that from dated 31.12.2024 the petitioner and her husband Gurcharn Ram etc. are not residing in the village and the respectable joined were apprised about the orders of the Hon'ble High Court and advised them to inform the police as and when the petitioner came back to the village. Hence, SHO PS Shutrana recommended for consigning the petition to record room. he contends that the petitioner is her allegations regarding taking away of CCTV are also false. The facts have not been disputed by the petitioner by filing any affidavit. It is apparent that allegations in the regarding taking away the DVR etc. tablished, nor could the threat to her life and liberty be assessed as her whereabouts are not known. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of petitioner that in case she apprehends threat to can be brought to the notice of third respondent/Senior Superintendent of That as far as regarding the threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner is concerned, the Senior Superintendent of Police 4611-13/CAW dated 25.01.2025 directed the deponent to assess the prescription to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Hence, the deponent deputed SHO PS Shutrana to submit report. SHO PS Shutrana went to the house of petitioner in Village Karim Nagar and also joined t Singh Sarpanch of the Village along with Namberdar Surjit Ram, and other respectable persons of the village, but the house of petitioner was found locked and none of the family member were available. Statements of respectables were losed that from dated 31.12.2024 the petitioner and her husband Gurcharn Ram etc. are not residing in the village and the respectable joined were apprised about the orders of the Hon'ble High Court and advised them to inform the tioner came back to the village. Hence, SHO PS Shutrana recommended for consigning the the petitioner is not even residing at the given regarding taking away of CCTV cameras, DVR, The facts have not been disputed by the petitioner by filing any allegations in the petition against the regarding taking away the DVR etc. have not even been prima nor could the threat to her life and liberty be assessed as her he petition stands disposed of with liberty to the in case she apprehends threat to her life and liberty in future, it the notice of third respondent/Senior Superintendent of That as far as regarding the threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner is concerned, the Senior Superintendent of Police 25.01.2025 directed the deponent to assess the prescription to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Hence, the deponent deputed SHO PS Shutrana to submit report. SHO PS Shutrana went to the house of petitioner in Village Karim Nagar and also joined t Singh Sarpanch of the Village along with Namberdar Surjit Ram, and other respectable persons of the village, but the the family member were available. Statements of respectables were losed that from dated 31.12.2024 the petitioner and her husband Gurcharn Ram etc. are not residing in the village and the respectable joined were apprised about the orders of the Hon'ble High Court and advised them to inform the tioner came back to the village. Hence, SHO PS Shutrana recommended for consigning the not even residing at the given , The facts have not been disputed by the petitioner by filing any against the prima nor could the threat to her life and liberty be assessed as her with liberty to the it the notice of third respondent/Senior Superintendent of Aman Dua 2025.09.12 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CRWP-15-2025 Police, Patiala, with law. 09.09.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025 -3- Patiala, who will take appropriate action (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? who will take appropriate action in the matter, in accordance TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No in accordance Aman Dua 2025.09.12 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document