IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (111) CM-17040-CII-2025 in/and FAO-5120-2025 Date of Decision : September 24, 2025 Mamta Rani .. Appellant Versus Rajinder Kumar .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate, for the respondent. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, it can be safely presumed that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. 2. The application for condonation of delay of 58 days as well as the main appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE September 24, 2025 (RAMESH KUMARI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.09.25 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document