Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94869 (ALL)

GUL BAHAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/34838/2025 · 2025-09-10

Kshitij Shailendra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34838 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed challenging the chargesheet dated 09.02.2025 and cognizance order dated 27.03.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.92 of 2025 (State vs. Samad and others), arising out of Case Crime No.271 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 110, 131, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station-Dhaulana, District-Hapur. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that certain vital defects have crept in while filing the present application and, therefore, the application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh application. 4. Learned A.G.A. has not opposed the prayer made. 5. This application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 6. Certified copies of the documents on record may be returned to learned counsel for the applicants within ten days, after retaining Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandrajeet Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gul Bahar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) photostat copies on record, which shall be supplied by learned counsel for the applicants within same period of time. September 11, 2025 Jyotsana NA528 No. 34838 of 2025 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad