IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 201 ANANYA THROUGH HER FATHER INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH THROGUH ITS DIRECTOR AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. Present : Mr Mr. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Himanshu Malik, Sr. Panel Counsel ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Petitioner has approached this Court cont 6002 as per the information provided on the designate she is not being considered for admission. It is further pointed out that authorities in fact have wrongly treated her rank to be 60026 in place of 6002. 2. On the previous occasion, entered appearance and ha authorities. Documents have been produced before this Court in order to show that in fact the rank of the petitioner is 60026 and 88 is a manipulated 3. Be that as it may, examination of relevant records has made a statement before us that correct IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. Date of decision: ANANYA THROUGH HER FATHER Versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH THROGUH ITS DIRECTOR AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Himanshu Malik, Sr. Panel Counsel **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (oral) Petitioner has approached this Court cont 6002 as per the information provided on the designate she is not being considered for admission. It is further pointed out that authorities in fact have wrongly treated her rank to be 60026 in place of 6002. On the previous occasion, Sh. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate had entered appearance and has also obtained instructions from the concerned authorities. Documents have been produced before this Court in order to show that in fact the rank of the petitioner is 60026 and manipulated document. Be that as it may, once the competent authority on the basis of examination of relevant records has made a statement before us that correct IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24763 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.09.2025 …. Petitioner INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH THROGUH ITS DIRECTOR AND OTHERS … Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Himanshu Malik, Sr. Panel Counsel for Union of India. Petitioner has approached this Court contending that her rank is 6002 as per the information provided on the designate website of IISER but she is not being considered for admission. It is further pointed out that the authorities in fact have wrongly treated her rank to be 60026 in place of 6002. Sh. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate had s also obtained instructions from the concerned authorities. Documents have been produced before this Court in order to show that in fact the rank of the petitioner is 60026 and document annexed at page once the competent authority on the basis of examination of relevant records has made a statement before us that correct INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH that her rank is IISER but the Sh. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate had s also obtained instructions from the concerned authorities. Documents have been produced before this Court in order to show document annexed at page once the competent authority on the basis of examination of relevant records has made a statement before us that correct Jyoti 2025.09.10 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rank of the petitioner is 60026 and not 6002, we are not persuaded to proceed further in the writ petition as there is neither any alle the concerned respondents nor we expect the respondents to disclose a wrong result for no obvious reasons. 4. In that view of the matter, this writ petition dismissed. 5. Pending application, if any, September 05, 2025 Jyoti-IV CWP No.24763 of 2025 rank of the petitioner is 60026 and not 6002, we are not persuaded to proceed further in the writ petition as there is neither any alle the concerned respondents nor we expect the respondents to disclose a wrong result for no obvious reasons. In that view of the matter, this writ petition Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA (ROHIT KAPOOR , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CWP No.24763 of 2025 -2- rank of the petitioner is 60026 and not 6002, we are not persuaded to proceed further in the writ petition as there is neither any allegation of mala fide against the concerned respondents nor we expect the respondents to disclose a wrong In that view of the matter, this writ petition fails and the same is also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No rank of the petitioner is 60026 and not 6002, we are not persuaded to proceed gation of mala fide against the concerned respondents nor we expect the respondents to disclose a wrong and the same is ) Jyoti 2025.09.10 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document