Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94862 (ALL)

ANUPAM CHATURVEDI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/20437/2025 · 2025-09-10

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20437 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Vakalatnama and short counter affidavit filed by Sri Rakesh Kumar Shukla on behalf of respondent no.4 today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned AGA for the State-respondents. 3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 23.8.2025, registered as Case Crime No.0094 of 2025, under Sections- 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 316(2), 89 of B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Mathura and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no.4 submits that the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and the respondent no.4 has no objection in case the impugned FIR is quashed. 5. Accordingly, the impugned FIR is quashed. 6. The writ petition is allowed. 7. Investigating officer of this case is directed to make entry of this compromise in the case diary. 8. Let this order be communicated to the S.S.P., Mathura, by the Registrar (Compliance) within 10 days. September 11, 2025 RA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Padmaker Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Anupam Chaturvedi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad