Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94851 (PAT)

KRISHNA RAM v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./51508/2025 · 2025-09-23

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51508 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1. KRISHNA RAM S/O LATE SADHU RAM R/o vill - Korandehari Tola, P.S. - Sahar, Distt.- Bhojpur 2. Kanti Devi W/o Krishna Ram R/o vill - Korandehari Tola, P.S. - Sahar, Distt.- Bhojpur 3. Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Paswan S/o Krishna Ram R/o vill - Korandehari Tola, P.S. - Sahar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 23-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 109, 303(2), 352 and 281 of the BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order dated 28.08.2025, a fresh copy of the FIR has been filed, as such, the defect stands removed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 is a woman and on account of dispute relating to goat, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51508 of 2025(3) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that initially an altercation took place in between the parties on account of which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that even the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the petitioners are not criminals. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 230 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T