Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94851 (ALL)

KOKILA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13589/2025 · 2025-09-10

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13589 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Verma, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Siddharth Krishna Bakshi, Advocate for Respondents-2 and 3. 2. Petitioner’s mother was granted compassionate appointment on 12.09.2014 on the post of Beldaar on probation. It is not on record, whether subsequently mother of petitioner was regularized and unfortunately she died in harness on 28.04.2021. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner as well as respondents has no instruction, whether mother of petitioner was regularized or not before she died in harness. 4. In aforesaid circumstances, prayer of petitioner to grant compassionate appointment since her mother died in harness cannot be considered since there there is no clarity about nature of appointment of petitioner’s mother. 5. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the concerned respondent firstly to ascertain the nature of appointment of his mother and in case petitioner files an application/ representation on basis of facts and law with regard to nature of appointment of his mother, the concerned respondent will consider it in accordance with law. September 11, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akansha Verma, Deepak Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Kokila .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad