Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9485 (RAJ)

NARESH KUMAR S/O JAGDISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3135/2025 · 2025-08-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30167] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3135/2025 Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish, R/o Plot No. T 336, Mangolpuri, Police Station Raja Park, Delhi Second Residence Of Plot No. 100, Rani Colony, Laxmi Nagar, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hasan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Fahad Hasan, Mr. Abdul Basit Naqvi & Mr. Aquif Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish in FIR No. 105/2022 dated 05.03.2022 registered at P.S. Mahesh Nagar District – Jaipur (South), whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Section/s 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. 2. The applicant(s) Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish was arrested and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned Senior Advocate for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned Senior Advocate further submitted that petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:30167] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3135/2025] has neither demanded any money nor he has received any money from complainant. He also submitted that he is not having any document to show himself to be an employee of High Court. He further submitted that poor person cannot pose himself to be an officer of High Court. He also referred the investigation and submitted that no recovery was effected and presently present petitioner is in custody for last few months and charge-sheet has already been filed. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned Senior Advocate for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On the basis of criminal complaint filed by Tej Kumar Godara (complainant) FIR no. 105/2022 was registered at P.S. Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (South) and after investigation this petitioner accused remained absconded and charge-sheet under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. is filed against him, thereafter [2025:RJ-JP:30167] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3135/2025] this accused was arrested. Presently he is in custody and disposal of criminal case will take its own time. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Naresh Kumar S/o Jagdish is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. [2025:RJ-JP:30167] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-3135/2025] 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ), J CHETNA BEHRANI /54