Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10815 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to direct the Civil Judge (S.D.), Azamgarh decide the to application 7C2 filed in Suit No. 348 of 2023 (Kiran Yatii Vs. Dheeraj Yati and others) within stipulated and reasonable period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court otherwise petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C2 Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Azamgarh to consider and decide the interim injunction application (7C2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Kiran Yatii .....Petitioner(s) Dheeraj Yatii And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 11, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 10815 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad