[2025:RJ-JP:30050] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1065/2002 Kamal Singh S/o Shri Madan Singh, aged about 38 years, resident of Plot No.2-B-29, Vishwakarma Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Public Health & Engineering Department, Jaipur. 2. The Executive Engineer, District-II, Public Health & Engineering Department, Hassanpura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nadeem Mazahir for Mr. Hitesh Bagri For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 05/08/2025 1. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to direct the respondents to regularize him on the post of Helper and grant the benefits consequential thereto. 2. It has been stated in memo of writ petition that as the petiioner was unemployed, therefore, he submitted an application (Annex.-1) in June, 1993 in the Office of Superintending Engineer, Drill Wrcti (P.H.E.D.), Jaipur for granting him employment and as per the petitioner, he was employed as Helper on Muster Roll. However, later on, in order to defeat the legitimate rights of the petitioner, payment of the petitioner was made through agency and despite serving for more than nine years, when no service benefits were given, he had no other alternative remedy except to [2025:RJ-JP:30050] (2 of 2) [CW-1065/2002] file the instant writ petition for the compassionate of regularization. 3. Reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents in which they have categorically denied the statements made in the writ petition by the petitioner and it has been submitted that the petitioner has worked only for a period of two months that too in the year 1993. Thereafter, petitioner has not worked with the respondents and they have also not made payment of any wages or salaries to the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, admittedly, petitioner was never employed after following due procedure of selection/ appointment and there are factual disputes involved in the instant writ petition. 5. As per judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC Page 1, no such prayer for regularization can be made to motivate back door entries in the Government service. 6. Hence, in view of above, there is no substance in the writ petition filed by the petitioner and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /1