Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9483 (PNJ)

PARAMJIT SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/12/2025 · 2025-07-21

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 265 CWP-12-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2025. PARAMJIT SINGH ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate, (Through Video Conference) for the petitioner(s). Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents/UOI. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Challenging the order dated 24.12.2024, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from SHQ, BSF, Amritsar to 160th Battalion, BSF, allegedly in violation of the guidelines issued on 10.04.2024, the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents/UOI submits that the petitioner is due to retire within a period of 03 months. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner may be permitted to file a comprehensive representation with the respondents for cancellation of the order of transfer and the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on such representation. Counsel for the respondents/UOI has no objection to the same. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in the event of petitioner submitting a representation the same shall be decided within a period of one month. July 21, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.07.22 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document